Mencari Bentuk Pembelajaran Rancang Kota dalam Konteks Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru

Authors

  • Dyah Titisari Widyastuti Departemen Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21460/smart.v5i1.144

Keywords:

alternative learning, pedagogy, urban design

Abstract

Title: Seeking Appropriate Approach for Urban Design Learning under the New Normal Condition

 

Basically, it is urgently needed to build appropriate learning methods in the current pandemic condition, where the teaching and learning process at various levels of education demands a major change from what originally took place face-to-face in educational institution classrooms to turning into screen-to-screen in the personal spaces of individual respective environments. This should not be as simple as simply transferring class material onto a computer screen, but more than that, how the pedagogical aspects of each discipline must be fulfilled, how learning competencies can be fulfilled equivalent to learning under normal conditions. Design learning basically cannot be separated from learning the process of designing in a studio, where pedagogically integrates a learner-centered approach, methods of interaction between learners, and the studio as a physical and social space that forms an atmosphere that triggers creativity. Likewise in urban design learning is based on not only a theoretical component but also an empirical component. This study aims to develop content and learning methods for urban design, that cannot be separated from its pedagogical aspects, as a form of adaptation of urban design learning norms during the pandemic period and their potential as an alternative learning method in the future.

References

Abrams, C. (1971). The language of cities: A glossary of terms. New York: Viking Adult.

Banerjee, T. & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (Eds). (2011). Companion to urban design. New York: Routledge.

Keswani, K. (2019). Urban design studio pedagogy: Thinking about informality. New Design Ideas, vol. 3 no. 2, 113-123.

Lukovich, T. (2017). On pedagogy for urban design – some observations. YBL Journal of Built Environment, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 84-101.

Lynch, K. (1981). A theory of good city form. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Pafka, E., Dovey, K. (2018). Urban design pedagogy: Mapping urbanities. New York: Routledge.

Rossi, A. (1984). The architecture of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Tim Penyusun Proposal MRK UGM. (2019). Naskah akademik usulan pendirian Program Studi Rancang Kota Departemen Teknik Arsitektur dan Perencanaan UGM. Tidak dipublikasikan.

Yorganc?o?lu, D. (2020). Critical reflections on the surface, pedagogical and epistemological features of the design studio under the “new normal” conditions. Journal of Design Studio, vol. 2 no. 1, 25-36.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-26

How to Cite

Widyastuti, D. T. (2021). Mencari Bentuk Pembelajaran Rancang Kota dalam Konteks Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru. SMART: Seminar on Architecture Research and Technology, 5(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21460/smart.v5i1.144