Peningkatan Kualitas Ruang dengan Intervensi Instalasi dari Material Barang Bekas di Hunian Mahasiswa Arsitektur dalam Mata Kuliah Studio Perancangan Dasar 02 Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana

Authors

  • Adimas Kristiadi Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Arsitektur dan Desain, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta
  • Ferdy Sabono Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Arsitektur dan Desain, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21460/smart.v5i1.152

Keywords:

room quality, space intervention, space installation

Abstract

Title: Improving Quality of Space with Intervention of The Installation of Used Materials in Architecture Student’s Residence, in Basic Design Studio 02 Duta Wacana Christian University

 

This research talks about the basic application of architectural design science with limited materials (response to the COVID-19 pandemic disaster). In this case, students are trained to see opportunities (looking for, identifying, processing, and using) used goods as design materials that can increase architectural usability. The Basic Design Studio (SPD) course builds basic skills of traditional craftsmanship, taste sensitivity, and insightful conceptual ideas. The estuary of the SPD course is to create a space installation to intervene in public spaces (physically) in people's lives with the special purpose of giving positive injections or stimulants to negative (dead) spaces so that they have attractiveness and at the same time can have a positive impact on the environment and society. The method of this research is deductive-qualitative, bringing the theory to see the case of how the intervention of negative space (dead) by SPD 02 students with the spatial installation design of used materials has an impact on people's lives. The output of this study is a standard room installation design from used materials that can improve the quality of negative space (dead) into positive space (living) in the residential and living environment around SPD 02 students, which does not rule out the possibility of being applied to a more spacious area. large.

References

Ariestya, F., Effendie, Y., Ray, T. (2010). Panduan ujian saringan masuk gambar arsitektur. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

Ching, F.D. (1996). Arsitektur: Form, space, and order. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Haryadi & Setiawan, B. (2010). Arsitektur, lingkungan dan perilaku: Pengantar ke teori, metodologi dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Muhadjir, N. (1996). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Fakultas Arsitektur dan Desain UKDW. (2020). Panduan Akademik Kurikulum 2016 Program Studi Arsitektur, Fakultas Arsitektur dan Desain, Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana.

Prabawasari, V.W. & Suparman, A. (1999). Tata ruang luar. Jakarta: Gunadarma.

Rosenthal, M. (2003). Understanding installation art: From duchamp to holzer. Munich: Prestel.

Sarwono, S.W. (1992). Psikologi lingkungan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiarsarana Indonesia.

Semiawan, C.R. (2009). Kreativitas dan keberbakatan. Jakarta: P.T. Indeks.

Supriyadi, B. & Sukawi, S. (2013). Penggunaan bambu dalam seni instalasi arsitektural, Modul, Vol. 13, No. 2, Hal 65-72.

White, E.T. (1987). Buku sumber konsep. Bandung: Intermatra.

Published

2021-07-26

How to Cite

Kristiadi, A., & Sabono, F. (2021). Peningkatan Kualitas Ruang dengan Intervensi Instalasi dari Material Barang Bekas di Hunian Mahasiswa Arsitektur dalam Mata Kuliah Studio Perancangan Dasar 02 Universitas Kristen Duta Wacana. SMART: Seminar on Architecture Research and Technology, 5(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.21460/smart.v5i1.152